Failed capitalism as communism? | Finweb.sk
Kiska was the decisive battle improved Fico stopped raiding
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
15 days ago
Almanacs Dia.sk ECOPRESS eRun.sk HNblogy HNClub HN Golf Tour HNlekáreň Mediweb.sk
Reviews failed capitalism as communism?
This crisis, however, is what can be seen in countries which two decades ago made their way out of communism. Therefore failed capitalism, like communism? In a word: no. Some countries that have experienced the transition, are in crisis, but the transition itself is in crisis.
The same is true of other areas: capitalist countries are in crisis, but capitalism itself is in crisis. Reform is needed. The great virtue of liberal democracies and market economies is the possibility of reform and adaptation. These properties have shown previously democracy. Now they have to do it again. Capitalism has crashed off a cliff
For us, what we were born shortly after World War II, the Cold War represented a great intellectual and political struggle of our lives. With the fall of communism ended in catastrophic epoch of millenarian politics and false notions of rational ins planned economy. She won freedom offered by democracy, and prosperity they bring markets. After that, communism is not over blow, but whimper, we owe largely Mikhail Gorbachev.
Looking back from 2009, however, forces us to think. A year ago, capitalism crashed off a cliff. With great efforts by states returned back on track. Piergiorgio Alessandri and Andrew Haldene of the Bank of England reported in his excellent paper that the total gross value of interventions in favor of banks has reached a height of 14,000 billion (9 400 000 000 000 8 400 billion pounds). This is state socialism.
As for the answer to the first question, the crisis has brought ins great decline in production. According to the EBRD, the average decline in gross domestic product in the post-communist countries in 2009 will represent 6.2 percent. Dips are varied: from 18.4% in Lithuania, 16.0% in Latvia, 14.4% in Ukraine and 13.2% in Estonia, the numbers are showing depression, to 7.8% in Slovenia, 6, 5% in Hungary, 6.0% in Slovakia and 4.3% in the Czech Republic.
The Polish economy is expected to grow this year by 1.3%. EBRD notes that generally "depends on the volume decline in production from the credit boom and debt in the pre-crisis period." Bubble burst causing damage. Worrying collapses
These collapses ins are real and worrying. However, it is necessary to put them into context. Firstly, many post-communist countries experienced after the initial - and largely inevitable - the collapse of the USSR a large increase in production. ins Poland was the star. In general, the most successful countries in which reform The most serious took place. Secondly, and this is perhaps surprising, post-communist countries made little twists reforms.
As the EBRD report notes, "changes of governments since the beginning of 2008 did not result in either no change regarding the position to reforms or were in favor of the pro-reform parties." To a large extent it corresponds to what is generally set in-moving countries. Clearly, the lack of alternative economic model. seems that neither populist adventurism is not attractive.
While the global economy is increasingly promotes health, heritage collapse of the Soviet empire - thus integrating much of Europe and the associated expansion of freedom towards the Russian border, or even for them - remains intact. The crisis has brought lessons
However, the crisis provides an important lesson. The philosopher Karl Popper explained the correct approach. Separated "progressive social engineering" designed to remedy specific difficulties of "utopian social engineering" aimed at transforming the whole society, an objective that, in practice, "led ins only to the use of violence instead of judgment."
Before the reformer tries to solve the problem, must try to identify the cause. If this crisis does not lie in the failure of the market economy as a whole, but weaknesses in the global financial and monetary system. Escape some of these failures is not possible. The future is substantially uncertain. They will make big mistakes. ins In places where the prevailing ins paradigm lead to great risk taking is likely to occur brutal axle.
Where risk is part of a large debt balances in the financial sector, the axle will probably mean the collapse of financial intermediation, as well as the whole economy. History teaches ins us that, if not avoided collapse, the consequences ins can be dramatic. It should further reforms
Governments and central banks, fortunately, learned from 30 last century and has been decided by the collapse of the financial system or the economy avoided. This is the right kind of "progressive with
Kiska was the decisive battle improved Fico stopped raiding
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
15 days ago
Almanacs Dia.sk ECOPRESS eRun.sk HNblogy HNClub HN Golf Tour HNlekáreň Mediweb.sk
Reviews failed capitalism as communism?
This crisis, however, is what can be seen in countries which two decades ago made their way out of communism. Therefore failed capitalism, like communism? In a word: no. Some countries that have experienced the transition, are in crisis, but the transition itself is in crisis.
The same is true of other areas: capitalist countries are in crisis, but capitalism itself is in crisis. Reform is needed. The great virtue of liberal democracies and market economies is the possibility of reform and adaptation. These properties have shown previously democracy. Now they have to do it again. Capitalism has crashed off a cliff
For us, what we were born shortly after World War II, the Cold War represented a great intellectual and political struggle of our lives. With the fall of communism ended in catastrophic epoch of millenarian politics and false notions of rational ins planned economy. She won freedom offered by democracy, and prosperity they bring markets. After that, communism is not over blow, but whimper, we owe largely Mikhail Gorbachev.
Looking back from 2009, however, forces us to think. A year ago, capitalism crashed off a cliff. With great efforts by states returned back on track. Piergiorgio Alessandri and Andrew Haldene of the Bank of England reported in his excellent paper that the total gross value of interventions in favor of banks has reached a height of 14,000 billion (9 400 000 000 000 8 400 billion pounds). This is state socialism.
As for the answer to the first question, the crisis has brought ins great decline in production. According to the EBRD, the average decline in gross domestic product in the post-communist countries in 2009 will represent 6.2 percent. Dips are varied: from 18.4% in Lithuania, 16.0% in Latvia, 14.4% in Ukraine and 13.2% in Estonia, the numbers are showing depression, to 7.8% in Slovenia, 6, 5% in Hungary, 6.0% in Slovakia and 4.3% in the Czech Republic.
The Polish economy is expected to grow this year by 1.3%. EBRD notes that generally "depends on the volume decline in production from the credit boom and debt in the pre-crisis period." Bubble burst causing damage. Worrying collapses
These collapses ins are real and worrying. However, it is necessary to put them into context. Firstly, many post-communist countries experienced after the initial - and largely inevitable - the collapse of the USSR a large increase in production. ins Poland was the star. In general, the most successful countries in which reform The most serious took place. Secondly, and this is perhaps surprising, post-communist countries made little twists reforms.
As the EBRD report notes, "changes of governments since the beginning of 2008 did not result in either no change regarding the position to reforms or were in favor of the pro-reform parties." To a large extent it corresponds to what is generally set in-moving countries. Clearly, the lack of alternative economic model. seems that neither populist adventurism is not attractive.
While the global economy is increasingly promotes health, heritage collapse of the Soviet empire - thus integrating much of Europe and the associated expansion of freedom towards the Russian border, or even for them - remains intact. The crisis has brought lessons
However, the crisis provides an important lesson. The philosopher Karl Popper explained the correct approach. Separated "progressive social engineering" designed to remedy specific difficulties of "utopian social engineering" aimed at transforming the whole society, an objective that, in practice, "led ins only to the use of violence instead of judgment."
Before the reformer tries to solve the problem, must try to identify the cause. If this crisis does not lie in the failure of the market economy as a whole, but weaknesses in the global financial and monetary system. Escape some of these failures is not possible. The future is substantially uncertain. They will make big mistakes. ins In places where the prevailing ins paradigm lead to great risk taking is likely to occur brutal axle.
Where risk is part of a large debt balances in the financial sector, the axle will probably mean the collapse of financial intermediation, as well as the whole economy. History teaches ins us that, if not avoided collapse, the consequences ins can be dramatic. It should further reforms
Governments and central banks, fortunately, learned from 30 last century and has been decided by the collapse of the financial system or the economy avoided. This is the right kind of "progressive with
No comments:
Post a Comment