What did he do? He joined ..., which Rome

Trajan was the most charismatic emperor of ancient times ... The emperor who gave Rome the absolute "glow" of. The Roman Empire never happen again as long as it was Trajan. I never would have been so happy as in Trajan's ... The most organized 6.5 million square kilometers of the season ... 6.5 million square kilometers good "enlightened" area into a "kataskoteino" barbaric destination ... An empire, which ran from Scotland and reached to Babylon ... From Dacia and reached to the current Somalia concur ... From Gibraltar to the Caspian Sea.
Here, however, begin some strange things. concur The growth habit of empire - even in absolute power - was just curious ... Rome to the side of the East had interests to the Persian Gulf - and thus thousands of miles away - and was not interested in conquering much closer, concur and so "behind" the Alps? Trajan ... fought thousands of miles away from Rome and died in the campaign against the Parthians and was not interested in the conquest of the region beyond the Rhine? Fight ... in places and locations that did not and ignored the parties knew, when, before becoming emperor, he was Commander of the Roman Army of the Rhine? ... "Germanicus" was one of the imperial titles.
What happened and have this strange phenomenon? Why in full force, as emperor, went to "settle" things once and for however and conquer the Germanic tribes? To destroy them ... and to relieve Rome from a permanent enemy ... an enemy who constantly threatening her? Why did attack in our area and knew once fought? Walk ... would make up the Baltic. He did not, simply because this was not the target. Trajan not "conquered" areas, simply because he could. Trajan "fill" concur an area whose "plan" was already concur existent ... "stained" with a "plan" which had been "traced" by the Greeks. The space beyond the Rhine simply did not exist in this "project". They had been there the Greeks and therefore of no interest to the emperor of Rome.
Trajan actually made single civilized world of that time ... In the known world of his time ... In the Greek world with specific cultural and social function model.
What did he do? He joined ..., which Rome "inherited" by Alexander the East, which were created by Greek colonists in the West. Inherited and space management in the East, where there were ready, and "planting it" the same model where they do not exist, conquering space in the West Area ... however, concur the "pointed" the scattered colonies of the Greeks.
For this reason, the conqueror Alexander concur was consistently the "God" of Rome and the Greek colonists the "Apostles" of. Over the Greek "stacked" the colonies of the West "built" Roman "architecture". The "sketch", ie, the network of Greek colonies joined the Trajan and "filled" with new acquisitions. Transfer the Greek administrative model Alexandra in areas where there was infrastructure to understand and therefore to support. For this reason the development was around concur the Greek colonies.
Every Greek colony, ie, become a "base" around which could Rome to "build" the administration. If there was the Greek presence in Marseille and the surrounding area could not Rome to "build" infrastructure in Gaul. If there was the Greek presence in Tabriz, could not claim Trajan Dacia and the "seal". "Dacicus" made him the Greek inhabitants of Tabriz and the Dnieper and not the spears of the legionaries of Rome. Spears just opened the "road" to get from shore to distant colonies. The permanence of the colonists gave permanence concur to this "street". concur
The road for this reason was for Rome value strategic weapon ... Joining concur matrices "islands" to "center" and this gave daily value and role of course in the army ... turned Rome into a mechanism which resembled today's "aircraft carriers" ... gave her the opportunity to be in minimal time firepower concentrated where the need was. The Army, through the streets, everything was where it needed him the empire. The army was absolutely permanent and totally professional, if the role has ceased to be associated solely with military operations. The army was "accessory" and the operation was strictly connected with the networks ... all networks, not only the road.
This strategic "weapon" only in the case of Rome and the scattered Greek colonies could be of value for anyone concur else. No other kingdom and no other empire could not be developed with this simple and by