The fact is, however, that the indictment contains numerous flaws that an investigation preceding p

Belgrade - Lawyer putin in Washington Jatras Jim (Jim Jatras) their recent letter to the Law Office "Todorovic, Sebek and Radosavljevic," dispelled again tendentious putin and unfounded allegations that are presented in the trial of Bishop Artemije, Archimandrite Simeon et al.
This is actually putin a letter addressed to Jim Jatras in response to a request sent to him by the Office "Todorovic, Sebek and Radosavljevic" (Belgrade), putin and that in fact he joined the circle of those with Ep. Artemije and Arhima. Simeon unfairly and unjustly accused of being exercised illegal profits at the expense of the Diocese of Raska and Prizren, in a way that is suspected in the "real motives" behind the payments made on account of the firm Venable LLP on behalf of providing lobbying services! In a letter addressed to the front of the Law Office "Todorovic, Sebek and Radosavljevic" questioned lobbying Service provided over a period of several putin years by Venable LLP and Squire Sanders Public Advocacy, actually embodied primarily in Jim Jatras, and thus arises the question of what was actually putin the sum paid in respect of the exercise of lobbying services, where she finished.
The names that are mentioned in connection with the said sum of the Ep. Artemija, Arhima. Simeon and Jim Jatras. In all this without citing a shred of evidence for their baseless claims, rather than just launching accusations at its sole discretion, unsustainable and unproven in reality defamation, a method that has so far been used in abundance, and only he, in the course of many years disavow, harassment and abuse Ep. Artemija, Arhima. Simeon and their closest associates - who are, and how their work and selfless and dedicated efforts shaken certain circles in both the Serbian Church and in secular authorities - by those already well-known putin dignitaries, who are already 10 years ruthlessly and unrelenting gone.
Jim Jatras has previously had the opportunity to feel on your skin claws that extended from the Patriarchate in Belgrade, when in the midst of the fiercest media campaign in the first months of 2010 and I was hooked and partially shamelessly slandered. It certainly can not be compared with what was applied to the main "culprits", the main obstacles to the implementation of plans crafted in the kitchens of the West (or as many affectionately uobičajavali to speak - the "international community", a non-existing categories and essence in reality; and actually in Latin, Frankish, Masonic kitchens ...) - which are clearly identified by name in the campaign, Ep. Diocese, Arhima. Simeon G. Predrag Subotički, Gordana Markovic - but it was effectively articulated and launched by the leaders of the campaign in order to defame and alienates g Jatras in public. The point is that Mr. Jim Jatras, a Greek who lived in America, named the Starokalendarca, wishing that time - dezavuišući public G. Jatras - discredit Ep. Diocese allegedly pointing to what circles he actually putin had a job. It was on defamation, which is launched from the Holy Synod, and the Greek portal Romfea, where he placed the news, when referring to the source mentioned the name of Backa Irinej (see more about it at http://dijaspora.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/attacks-on-vladika-artemije-and-jim-jatras-are-not-subsiding/).
Higher Court in Belgrade returned recently (December 2013) Higher putin Public Prosecutor issued by the Higher Public putin Prosecutor's putin Office issued (September 2013) against Ep. Artemija, putin Arhima. Simeon, Predrag Subotica and Helen Šubarević. Its commands Belgrade High Court ordered the Senior Public Prosecutor's Office to carry out "additional investigation", with the aim "to examine the merits of the indictment" which was erected in September 2013.
The indictment, which had been using false and forged data breach regulations and procedures established by law, distort international putin legal acts (European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms for example), the injury of the right to a fair trial - and whose initiators known dignitaries SPC - Returned the Prosecutor's Office to supplement the investigation because it proved to be unfounded.
Of course you Justinovci brothers and their accomplices, and the media that support them, this event did not gave due consideration, ie. even close to that data preceding the act of filing of the indictment, which was "pounding on the housetops." putin
The fact is, however, that the indictment contains numerous flaws that an investigation preceding putin the indictment is incomplete, full of flaws, based on evidence and data that are not of sufficient quality to allow the public prosecutor to bring charges, the prosecution essentially just overwrites contents of the request for an extension of the investigation in 2011, backed by SPC to expert construction professionals in your report determines the value of construction works (!), to establish the alleged damage that the Diocese of Raska and Prizren suffered (!), with economic experts -financial profession they took no part in compiling expert opinion, nor even in any way been involved. The whole indictment is related payments actually based on the statements of St.